It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FIVN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMITK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FIVN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MITK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
FIVN (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.28% price change this week, while MITK (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.38%.
FIVN is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
MITK is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
FIVN | MITK | FIVN / MITK | |
Capitalization | 4.55B | 673M | 677% |
EBITDA | -10.62M | 29M | -37% |
Gain YTD | -62.625 | -35.429 | 177% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 84.65 | - |
Revenue | 910M | 132M | 689% |
Total Cash | 730M | 61.9M | 1,179% |
Total Debt | 794M | 132M | 602% |
FIVN | MITK | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 84 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 48 Fair valued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 83 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 33 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FIVN's Valuation (48) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MITK (73). This means that FIVN’s stock grew similarly to MITK’s over the last 12 months.
FIVN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MITK (100). This means that FIVN’s stock grew similarly to MITK’s over the last 12 months.
MITK's SMR Rating (91) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FIVN (93). This means that MITK’s stock grew similarly to FIVN’s over the last 12 months.
MITK's Price Growth Rating (83) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FIVN (87). This means that MITK’s stock grew similarly to FIVN’s over the last 12 months.
MITK's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FIVN (100). This means that MITK’s stock grew significantly faster than FIVN’s over the last 12 months.
FIVN | MITK | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago72% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago72% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago72% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago73% | 7 days ago76% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago77% | 3 days ago73% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago75% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
JVAAX | 41.03 | 0.38 | +0.93% |
JPMorgan Value Advantage A | |||
VREMX | 8.05 | 0.07 | +0.88% |
Virtus SGA Emerging Markets Equity R6 | |||
MLMIX | 20.75 | 0.17 | +0.83% |
Morgan Stanley Instl Global Core I | |||
IRVAX | 31.88 | 0.26 | +0.82% |
Voya Russell Large Cap Value Idx Port A | |||
AFYCX | 26.40 | 0.13 | +0.49% |
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth C |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIVN has been loosely correlated with NRDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIVN jumps, then NRDY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FIVN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FIVN | 100% | +4.36% | ||
NRDY - FIVN | 57% Loosely correlated | +4.95% | ||
MITK - FIVN | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
CLSK - FIVN | 50% Loosely correlated | +10.62% | ||
TLS - FIVN | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
PUBM - FIVN | 49% Loosely correlated | +2.86% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MITK has been loosely correlated with NRDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MITK jumps, then NRDY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MITK | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MITK | 100% | -0.71% | ||
NRDY - MITK | 56% Loosely correlated | +4.95% | ||
FIVN - MITK | 55% Loosely correlated | +4.36% | ||
PUBM - MITK | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.86% | ||
CLSK - MITK | 46% Loosely correlated | +10.62% | ||
TLS - MITK | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
More |