Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIWBX vs RAMHX
FIWBX vs RAMHX Comparison
Open Charts FIWBX vs RAMHX
FIWBX vs RAMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIWBX vs. RAMHX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIWBX is a Hold and RAMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RAMHX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FIWBX (3.69B). FIWBX pays higher dividends than RAMHX: FIWBX (3.52) vs RAMHX (1.39). FIWBX was incepted earlier than RAMHX: FIWBX (8 years) vs RAMHX (12 years). RAMHX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FIWBX (0.77). FIWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 225.00 vs. RAMHX (50.00). FIWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RAMHX: FIWBX (0) vs RAMHX (250). FIWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.75 vs. RAMHX (16.13). FIWBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.62 vs. RAMHX (33.47).
| FIWBX | RAMHX | FIWBX / RAMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.04 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.04 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.241 | 9.124 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.69B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.52 | 1.39 | 253% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.75 | 16.13 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.35 | 42.28 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.62 | 33.47 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.73 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement