Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIWBX vs RLBAX
FIWBX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FIWBX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Z
Price$15.63
Change+$0.11 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.01B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.28
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.06B
FIWBX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIWBX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIWBX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. FIWBX (3.01B). FIWBX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FIWBX (3.84) vs RLBAX (1.15). FIWBX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FIWBX (7 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FIWBX (0.74). FIWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 230.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). FIWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FIWBX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FIWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.20 vs. RLBAX (9.12). FIWBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.86 vs. RLBAX (37.86).
| FIWBX | RLBAX | FIWBX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.31 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.31 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.924 | 12.839 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.01B | 263B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.84 | 1.15 | 333% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.20 | 9.12 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.78 | 40.57 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.86 | 37.86 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement