Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIWBX vs RLBAX
FIWBX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FIWBX vs RLBAX
FIWBX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIWBX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIWBX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FIWBX (3.69B). FIWBX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FIWBX (3.52) vs RLBAX (1.14). FIWBX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FIWBX (8 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FIWBX (0.77). FIWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 225.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). FIWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FIWBX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FIWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.75 vs. RLBAX (15.80). FIWBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.62 vs. RLBAX (31.83).
| FIWBX | RLBAX | FIWBX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.32 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.32 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.241 | 8.988 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.69B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.52 | 1.14 | 309% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.75 | 15.80 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.35 | 41.07 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.62 | 31.83 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 80.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement