Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIWBX vs RLBEX
FIWBX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts FIWBX vs RLBEX
FIWBX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIWBX vs. RLBEX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIWBX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FIWBX (3.53B). FIWBX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: FIWBX (3.79) vs RLBEX (1.79). FIWBX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: FIWBX (8 years) vs RLBEX (24 years). FIWBX (0.77) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). FIWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 225.00 vs. RLBEX (50.00). FIWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: FIWBX (0) vs RLBEX (250). FIWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.78 vs. RLBEX (12.60). FIWBX return over 5 years is better than : 39.17 vs. RLBEX (33.99).
| FIWBX | RLBEX | FIWBX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.60 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.60 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.337 | 10.082 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.53B | 283B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.79 | 1.79 | 211% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.78 | 12.60 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.94 | 44.99 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.17 | 33.99 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement