Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIWCX vs TRIGX
FIWCX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts FIWCX vs TRIGX
FIWCX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIWCX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jun 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIWCX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.3B vs. FIWCX (13.3B). FIWCX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: FIWCX (3.18) vs TRIGX (2.38). FIWCX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: FIWCX (8 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.81) is less costly to investors than FIWCX (0.16). FIWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). FIWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: FIWCX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). FIWCX (26.01) and TRIGX (25.10) have marching annual gain over last year. TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 76.71 vs. FIWCX (66.38).
| FIWCX | TRIGX | FIWCX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.16 | 0.81 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.16 | 0.81 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.643 | 7.696 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.3B | 16.3B | 82% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.18 | 2.38 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.01 | 25.10 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.42 | 80.77 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.38 | 76.71 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 150.62 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement