Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIWCX vs TRIGX
FIWCX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts FIWCX vs TRIGX
FIWCX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIWCX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIWCX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.7B vs. FIWCX (13.6B). FIWCX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: FIWCX (3.21) vs TRIGX (2.38). FIWCX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: FIWCX (9 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). TRIGX (0.81) is less costly to investors than FIWCX (0.16). FIWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). FIWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: FIWCX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). FIWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.55 vs. TRIGX (28.99). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 95.31 vs. FIWCX (84.24).
| FIWCX | TRIGX | FIWCX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.16 | 0.81 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.16 | 0.81 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.633 | 13.415 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.6B | 16.7B | 81% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.21 | 2.38 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.55 | 28.99 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.93 | 80.59 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.24 | 95.31 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 153.70 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers