Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIWCX vs TRIGX
FIWCX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts FIWCX vs TRIGX
FIWCX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIWCX vs. TRIGX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIWCX is a Buy and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 17.3B vs. FIWCX (14.2B). FIWCX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: FIWCX (3.07) vs TRIGX (2.29). FIWCX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: FIWCX (9 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). TRIGX (0.81) is less costly to investors than FIWCX (0.16). FIWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). FIWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: FIWCX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX (27.69) and FIWCX (26.95) have marching annual gain over last year. TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 102.01 vs. FIWCX (90.11).
| FIWCX | TRIGX | FIWCX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.16 | 0.81 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.16 | 0.81 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.936 | 17.452 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.2B | 17.3B | 82% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.07 | 2.29 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.95 | 27.69 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.25 | 96.38 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.11 | 102.01 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 155.73 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers