Advertisement
FIZZ vs KALU
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIZZ is a Hold and KALU is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FIZZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKALU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FIZZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- KALU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FIZZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KALU’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FIZZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- KALU’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FIZZ (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -2.91% price change this week, while KALU (@Aluminum) price change was +0.88% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +2.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.35%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aluminum industry was +0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.73%.
Reported Earning Dates
FIZZ is expected to report earnings on Dec 04, 2025.
KALU is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+2.03% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
@Aluminum (+0.41% weekly)Aluminum is widely used in the industries like construction, packaging and automotive sector. The segment has seen increased demand for the lightweight variety in automobiles in improving fuel efficiency. The U.S. aluminum industry generates nearly $71 billion a year in direct economic impact (according to The Aluminum Association). Arconic, Inc, Alcoa Corp and Kaiser Aluminum Corporation are major aluminum companies in the U.S.
| FIZZ | KALU | FIZZ / KALU | |
| Capitalization | 3.56B | 1.25B | 285% |
| EBITDA | 256M | 237M | 108% |
| Gain YTD | -10.851 | 13.407 | -81% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.21 | 23.25 | 83% |
| Revenue | 1.2B | 3.11B | 39% |
| Total Cash | 194M | 13.1M | 1,481% |
| Total Debt | 72.1M | 1.11B | 7% |
FIZZ | KALU | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 25 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 72 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KALU's Valuation (6) in the Aluminum industry is significantly better than the same rating for FIZZ (94) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that KALU’s stock grew significantly faster than FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
KALU's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the Aluminum industry is in the same range as FIZZ (85) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that KALU’s stock grew similarly to FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
FIZZ's SMR Rating (25) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KALU (78) in the Aluminum industry. This means that FIZZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than KALU’s over the last 12 months.
KALU's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Aluminum industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FIZZ (83) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that KALU’s stock grew somewhat faster than FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
KALU's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Aluminum industry is in the same range as FIZZ (72) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that KALU’s stock grew similarly to FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
| FIZZ | KALU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 68% | 6 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 62% | 13 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NRLCX | 50.63 | -0.04 | -0.08% |
| Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value R6 | |||
| NEMCX | 24.80 | -0.05 | -0.20% |
| Neuberger Berman Emerg Mkts Eq C | |||
| JDPNX | 16.02 | -0.09 | -0.56% |
| Janus Henderson Mid Cap Value N | |||
| IMEGX | 23.39 | -0.17 | -0.72% |
| Macquarie Systematic Em Mkts Eq R6 | |||
| MSJAX | 19.99 | -0.24 | -1.19% |
| Morgan Stanley Global Endurance A | |||
KALU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KALU has been loosely correlated with CSTM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KALU jumps, then CSTM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KALU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KALU | 100% | -2.11% | ||
| CSTM - KALU | 61% Loosely correlated | -5.68% | ||
| AA - KALU | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| CENX - KALU | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.49% | ||
| NHYDY - KALU | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.98% | ||
| NHYKF - KALU | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.58% | ||
More | ||||