CENX
Price
$44.77
Change
-$0.11 (-0.25%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
4.43B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KALU
Price
$159.68
Change
-$0.04 (-0.03%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
2.61B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CENX vs KALU

CENX vs KALU Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 26, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Century Aluminum (CENX) vs. Kaiser Aluminum (KALU) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Century Aluminum (CENX) and Kaiser Aluminum (KALU) operate at different points in the aluminum value chain: CENX is a primary aluminum producer, while KALU manufactures semi-fabricated specialty aluminum products for aerospace, packaging, and automotive end markets.
  • Both stocks have posted strong year-over-year returns, with CENX gaining approximately 103% and KALU gaining approximately 91% over the trailing twelve months, reflecting robust aluminum pricing and favorable tariff environments.
  • CENX carries a higher beta of 1.97 compared to KALU's 1.58, indicating greater sensitivity to broader market swings and commodity price fluctuations.
  • KALU offers a quarterly dividend (approximately $3.08 annually, yielding roughly 1.89%), whereas CENX does not pay a dividend, making KALU potentially more appealing to income-oriented investors.
  • Both companies have been direct beneficiaries of Section 232 aluminum tariffs, though CENX has greater direct exposure to primary metal pricing, while KALU's conversion-revenue model provides a degree of insulation from raw material cost volatility.

Introduction

Investors tracking the metals and materials sector often encounter two aluminum-focused names that, despite their shared industry, represent fundamentally different investment propositions. CENX (Century Aluminum Company) is a primary aluminum producer operating smelters across the United States and Iceland, while KALU (Kaiser Aluminum Corporation) manufactures semi-fabricated specialty aluminum products for aerospace, packaging, general engineering, and automotive applications. This stock comparison examines how these two companies have performed in recent months, what has driven their relative momentum, and how their business models position them for different market environments. For traders and investors evaluating exposure to the aluminum sector, understanding the contrasts between an upstream commodity producer and a downstream value-added manufacturer is essential to making informed decisions.

CENX Overview and Recent Performance

Century Aluminum Company is a primary aluminum producer with smelting operations in Hawesville, Sebree, and Mt. Holly in the United States, as well as a facility in Grundartangi, Iceland. It also holds bauxite mining and alumina refining assets in Jamaica and a carbon anode production facility in the Netherlands. The company generates revenue primarily through the sale of standard-grade and value-added primary aluminum products, with Glencore serving as the key purchaser of its North American output.

In recent months, CENX has experienced notable price appreciation alongside robust operational momentum. Full-year 2025 adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) attributable to stockholders reached $425.1 million, more than 70% above the prior year's $244.2 million. The company's shares have been supported by the Section 232 aluminum tariff program, which has raised import duties on aluminum—first to 25% and subsequently to 50% by mid-2025—strengthening domestic pricing. CENX has also pursued growth initiatives, including a joint development agreement with Emirates Global Aluminium to construct a new smelter in Oklahoma—the first greenfield primary aluminum smelter in the United States since 1980—and the restart of idled capacity at its Mt. Holly facility. The company guided for first-quarter 2026 adjusted EBITDA between $215 million and $235 million. With a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio near 13.8, the stock has traded within a 52-week range of approximately $20 to $70 and carries a high beta of 1.97, highlighting its substantial volatility.

KALU Overview and Recent Performance

Kaiser Aluminum Corporation specializes in the production of semi-fabricated specialty aluminum mill products, including flat-rolled plate, sheet, and coil, as well as extruded and drawn shapes. Its end markets span aerospace and defense, beverage and food packaging, general engineering, and automotive extrusions. The company sells directly to aerospace original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), tier-one suppliers, packaging manufacturers, and metal service centers.

KALU delivered record full-year 2025 adjusted EBITDA of $310 million, marking five consecutive quarters ahead of internal expectations. Full-year net sales rose approximately 12% to $3.37 billion, while net income reached $113 million, or $6.77 per diluted share. During recent trading weeks, the stock has shown resilience, though it pulled back sharply in late July 2026 following what appeared to be an earnings-related event. KALU maintains a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share, translating to an annualized yield near 1.89%, and a net debt leverage ratio of 3.4x—a figure management has stated it aims to reduce. The company's Phase VII expansion at its Trentwood facility and a new roll coat line are expected to support future conversion revenue growth. With a trailing P/E ratio of approximately 12.1 and a beta of 1.58, KALU has demonstrated somewhat lower volatility than its upstream peer while still participating in the broader aluminum sector rally.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking to navigate the dynamics of stocks like CENX and KALU, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of top-performing algorithmic trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across multiple timeframes, styles, and strategies. However, only those bots demonstrating the strongest adaptability to current market conditions earn a place in the Trending section. These bots employ Financial Learning Models (FLMs)—purpose-built AI architectures that continuously ingest price action, volume, and volatility data—enabling them to generate trade signals with win rates that have reached as high as 67% and annualized returns exceeding 100% in some strategies. Bots range from 5-minute intraday agents to 60-minute swing traders, covering single-ticker setups and multi-asset portfolios alike. Visit the Trending AI Robots page to explore which automated strategies are currently proving most effective.

Head-to-Head Comparison

While CENX and KALU both participate in the aluminum industry, their business models diverge meaningfully. CENX operates upstream as a primary aluminum producer, meaning its profitability is highly leveraged to the London Metal Exchange (LME) aluminum price and regional delivery premiums such as the Midwest Premium. This direct commodity exposure has fueled explosive earnings growth during periods of rising aluminum prices but also introduces heightened earnings variability. By contrast, KALU operates downstream, manufacturing high-value, engineered aluminum products. Its conversion-revenue model—where the cost of alloyed metal is largely passed through to customers—means KALU's profitability is driven more by manufacturing spreads, product mix, and end-market demand than by raw aluminum price swings.

In terms of scale, KALU generated approximately $3.37 billion in full-year 2025 revenue versus CENX's $2.53 billion. However, CENX's market capitalization of roughly $4.6 billion exceeds KALU's $2.7 billion, reflecting the market's premium valuation of primary aluminum exposure in the current tariff-driven environment. On volatility metrics, CENX's higher beta (1.97 vs. 1.58) and wider 52-week trading range underscore its more speculative profile. KALU's quarterly dividend and lower beta may appeal to investors favoring income and reduced turbulence, while CENX offers purer, higher-octane exposure to aluminum price trends.

Both companies face elevated geopolitical and trade-policy risk, particularly given the centrality of Section 232 tariffs to domestic aluminum economics. CENX carries additional operational risks tied to smelter restarts and power agreements, while KALU contends with aerospace OEM destocking cycles and the ramp-up of new production lines.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable market data, CENX appears to present a somewhat stronger near-term case from a trend-consistency and catalyst perspective. The company's upward earnings trajectory—guiding for first-quarter 2026 adjusted EBITDA of $215–235 million—combined with the Mt. Holly restart and the landmark Oklahoma smelter development agreement, provides a runway of potential growth catalysts that an AI-driven model would likely weigh favorably. However, the stock's elevated beta and recent pullback from highs near $70 to the mid-$40s suggest that timing and entry points matter considerably. KALU, while more stable and offering a dividend, faces headwinds including commercial aerospace destocking and a slower-than-expected ramp of its new coating line. A probabilistic AI framework might favor CENX for its stronger momentum signals and higher sensitivity to favorable tariff-driven pricing, while acknowledging that KALU's lower volatility and consistent execution could make it the steadier long-term compounder. The choice ultimately hinges on the investor's risk appetite and time horizon.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CENX vs. KALU commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CENX is a StrongBuy and KALU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (CENX: $44.77 vs. KALU: $159.68)
Brand notoriety: CENX and KALU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Aluminum industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CENX: 65% vs. KALU: 37%
Market capitalization -- CENX: $4.43B vs. KALU: $2.61B
CENX [@Aluminum] is valued at $4.43B. KALU’s [@Aluminum] market capitalization is $2.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Aluminum] industry ranges from $54.35B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Aluminum] industry is $5.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CENX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKALU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CENX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KALU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KALU is a better buy in the long-term than CENX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CENX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KALU’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CENX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • KALU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CENX is a better buy in the short-term than KALU.

Price Growth

CENX (@Aluminum) experienced а -3.12% price change this week, while KALU (@Aluminum) price change was -2.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aluminum industry was -1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

CENX is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

KALU is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Aluminum (-1.77% weekly)

Aluminum is widely used in the industries like construction, packaging and automotive sector. The segment has seen increased demand for the lightweight variety in automobiles in improving fuel efficiency. The U.S. aluminum industry generates nearly $71 billion a year in direct economic impact (according to The Aluminum Association). Arconic, Inc, Alcoa Corp and Kaiser Aluminum Corporation are major aluminum companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CENX($4.43B) has a higher market cap than KALU($2.61B). CENX has higher P/E ratio than KALU: CENX (13.32) vs KALU (11.85). KALU YTD gains are higher at: 41.100 vs. CENX (14.267). KALU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 478M vs. CENX (444M). CENX has more cash in the bank: 244M vs. KALU (58.5M). CENX has less debt than KALU: CENX (546M) vs KALU (1.07B). KALU has higher revenues than CENX: KALU (4.14B) vs CENX (2.54B).
CENXKALUCENX / KALU
Capitalization4.43B2.61B170%
EBITDA444M478M93%
Gain YTD14.26741.10035%
P/E Ratio13.3211.85112%
Revenue2.54B4.14B61%
Total Cash244M58.5M417%
Total Debt546M1.07B51%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CENX vs KALU: Fundamental Ratings
CENX
KALU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6950
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4250
SMR RATING
1..100
2737
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7795
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KALU's Valuation (14) in the Aluminum industry is significantly better than the same rating for CENX (81). This means that KALU’s stock grew significantly faster than CENX’s over the last 12 months.

CENX's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Aluminum industry is in the same range as KALU (50). This means that CENX’s stock grew similarly to KALU’s over the last 12 months.

CENX's SMR Rating (27) in the Aluminum industry is in the same range as KALU (37). This means that CENX’s stock grew similarly to KALU’s over the last 12 months.

KALU's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Aluminum industry is in the same range as CENX (45). This means that KALU’s stock grew similarly to CENX’s over the last 12 months.

CENX's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Aluminum industry is in the same range as KALU (95). This means that CENX’s stock grew similarly to KALU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CENXKALU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CENX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KALU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGT10.830.08
+0.74%
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust
FTMS9.890.02
+0.20%
Franklin Short-Term Municipal Income ETF
ACLO50.540.02
+0.04%
TCW AAA CLO ETF
DFNM47.65-0.02
-0.04%
Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF
KGRN24.36-0.30
-1.22%
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Tech ETF

CENX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CENX has been loosely correlated with KALU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CENX jumps, then KALU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CENX
1D Price
Change %
CENX100%
-0.25%
KALU - CENX
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
CSTM - CENX
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.77%
AA - CENX
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%

KALU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KALU has been loosely correlated with CSTM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KALU jumps, then CSTM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KALU
1D Price
Change %
KALU100%
-0.03%
CSTM - KALU
66%
Loosely correlated
-2.77%
CENX - KALU
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
AA - KALU
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%