Advertisement
CENX vs KALU
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CENX is a Hold and KALU is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CENX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKALU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CENX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- KALU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CENX’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KALU’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CENX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 8 bearish.
- KALU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CENX (@Aluminum) experienced а -5.99% price change this week, while KALU (@Aluminum) price change was -15.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aluminum industry was -6.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.87%.
Reported Earning Dates
CENX is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.
KALU is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Aluminum (-6.50% weekly)Aluminum is widely used in the industries like construction, packaging and automotive sector. The segment has seen increased demand for the lightweight variety in automobiles in improving fuel efficiency. The U.S. aluminum industry generates nearly $71 billion a year in direct economic impact (according to The Aluminum Association). Arconic, Inc, Alcoa Corp and Kaiser Aluminum Corporation are major aluminum companies in the U.S.
| CENX | KALU | CENX / KALU | |
| Capitalization | 4.35B | 2.52B | 173% |
| EBITDA | 444M | 478M | 93% |
| Gain YTD | 12.098 | 36.222 | 33% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.59 | 11.44 | 66% |
| Revenue | 2.54B | 4.14B | 61% |
| Total Cash | 244M | 58.5M | 417% |
| Total Debt | 546M | 1.07B | 51% |
CENX | KALU | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 26 | 36 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KALU's Valuation (10) in the Aluminum industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CENX (74). This means that KALU’s stock grew somewhat faster than CENX’s over the last 12 months.
CENX's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Aluminum industry is in the same range as KALU (53). This means that CENX’s stock grew similarly to KALU’s over the last 12 months.
CENX's SMR Rating (26) in the Aluminum industry is in the same range as KALU (36). This means that CENX’s stock grew similarly to KALU’s over the last 12 months.
KALU's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Aluminum industry is in the same range as CENX (57). This means that KALU’s stock grew similarly to CENX’s over the last 12 months.
KALU's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the Aluminum industry is in the same range as CENX (97). This means that KALU’s stock grew similarly to CENX’s over the last 12 months.
| CENX | KALU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 81% | 13 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 64% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| WSML | 35.87 | 0.27 | +0.75% |
| iShares MSCI World Small-Cap ETF | |||
| MVFG | 35.61 | 0.20 | +0.57% |
| Monarch Volume Factor Gbl Uncons ETF | |||
| IXN | 139.46 | 0.39 | +0.28% |
| iShares Global Tech ETF | |||
| TEMD | 24.67 | N/A | N/A |
| Templeton Emerging Markets Debt ETF | |||
| SMCZ | 3.35 | -0.14 | -4.01% |
| Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF | |||
CENX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CENX has been loosely correlated with KALU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CENX jumps, then KALU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CENX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENX | 100% | +1.20% | ||
| KALU - CENX | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.99% | ||
| CSTM - CENX | -0% Poorly correlated | +1.92% | ||
| AA - CENX | -9% Poorly correlated | +2.57% |
KALU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KALU has been closely correlated with CSTM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KALU jumps, then CSTM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KALU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KALU | 100% | +1.99% | ||
| CSTM - KALU | 68% Closely correlated | +1.92% | ||
| CENX - KALU | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.20% | ||
| AA - KALU | 18% Poorly correlated | +2.57% |