FJTSF
Price
$23.86
Change
+$1.88 (+8.55%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
41.75B
NOSUF
Price
$0.02
Change
+$0.01 (+100.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.31M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FJTSF vs NOSUF

Header iconFJTSF vs NOSUF Comparison
Open Charts FJTSF vs NOSUFBanner chart's image
Fujitsu
Price$23.86
Change+$1.88 (+8.55%)
Volume$3.31K
Capitalization41.75B
Nerds On Site
Price$0.02
Change+$0.01 (+100.00%)
Volume$9.53K
Capitalization1.31M
FJTSF vs NOSUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FJTSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NOSUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FJTSF vs. NOSUF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FJTSF is a StrongBuy and NOSUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FJTSF: $23.86 vs. NOSUF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: FJTSF and NOSUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FJTSF: 57% vs. NOSUF: 37%
Market capitalization -- FJTSF: $41.75B vs. NOSUF: $1.31M
FJTSF [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $41.75B. NOSUF’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $1.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $271.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $10.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FJTSF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNOSUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FJTSF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NOSUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FJTSF is a better buy in the long-term than NOSUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FJTSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOSUF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FJTSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NOSUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NOSUF is a better buy in the short-term than FJTSF.

Price Growth

FJTSF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +0.52% price change this week, while NOSUF (@Information Technology Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +2.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (+2.81% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FJTSF($41.7B) has a higher market cap than NOSUF($1.31M). FJTSF YTD gains are higher at: 49.125 vs. NOSUF (-54.005). FJTSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 367B vs. NOSUF (-490K). FJTSF has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. NOSUF (271K). NOSUF has less debt than FJTSF: NOSUF (411K) vs FJTSF (286B). FJTSF has higher revenues than NOSUF: FJTSF (3.74T) vs NOSUF (11.5M).
FJTSFNOSUFFJTSF / NOSUF
Capitalization41.7B1.31M3,183,206%
EBITDA367B-490K-74,898,571%
Gain YTD49.125-54.005-91%
P/E Ratio30.12N/A-
Revenue3.74T11.5M32,530,435%
Total Cash357B271K131,734,317%
Total Debt286B411K69,586,375%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FJTSF vs NOSUF: Fundamental Ratings
FJTSF
NOSUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4192
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FJTSF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOSUF (75). This means that FJTSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOSUF’s over the last 12 months.

FJTSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NOSUF (100). This means that FJTSF’s stock grew significantly faster than NOSUF’s over the last 12 months.

FJTSF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NOSUF (100). This means that FJTSF’s stock grew similarly to NOSUF’s over the last 12 months.

FJTSF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOSUF (92). This means that FJTSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOSUF’s over the last 12 months.

FJTSF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NOSUF (100). This means that FJTSF’s stock grew significantly faster than NOSUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FJTSFNOSUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FJTSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NOSUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZTEK1.110.04
+3.74%
Zentek Ltd
CMS70.470.78
+1.12%
CMS Energy Corp
ELWS3.200.03
+0.95%
Earlyworks Co Ltd.
ABM47.93-0.08
-0.18%
ABM Industries
STOK11.48-0.07
-0.61%
Stoke Therapeutics

FJTSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FJTSF has been loosely correlated with CAPMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FJTSF jumps, then CAPMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FJTSF
1D Price
Change %
FJTSF100%
+8.55%
CAPMF - FJTSF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
FJTSY - FJTSF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
CFTLF - FJTSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KNRLF - FJTSF
10%
Poorly correlated
+9.00%
FDRVF - FJTSF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NOSUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NOSUF and PVTRF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NOSUF and PVTRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOSUF
1D Price
Change %
NOSUF100%
N/A
PVTRF - NOSUF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NIPNF - NOSUF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTDTY - NOSUF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
ISMAY - NOSUF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.25%
FJTSF - NOSUF
1%
Poorly correlated
+8.55%
More