Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKACX vs RGACX
FKACX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FKACX vs RGACX
Franklin Growth Opportunities C
Price$33.87
Change-$0.22 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.69B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$81.80
Change-$0.47 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.04B
FKACX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKACX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKACX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. FKACX (4.69B). RGACX pays higher dividends than FKACX: RGACX (0.07) vs FKACX (0.00). FKACX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FKACX (26 years) vs RGACX (23 years). FKACX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). FKACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.59 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKACX: RGACX (250) vs FKACX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.26 vs. FKACX (-4.40). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 36.08 vs. FKACX (-16.55).
| FKACX | RGACX | FKACX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.94 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.94 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.431 | 13.627 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.69B | 329B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.40 | 12.26 | -36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.94 | 55.23 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.55 | 36.08 | -46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.84 | 97.36 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement