Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKACX vs RGACX
FKACX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FKACX vs RGACX
FKACX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKACX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKACX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FKACX (4.59B). FKACX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FKACX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FKACX (27 years) vs RGACX (24 years). FKACX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FKACX (27.59). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKACX: RGACX (250) vs FKACX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.68 vs. FKACX (-15.39). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.46 vs. FKACX (-41.05).
| FKACX | RGACX | FKACX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.93 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.93 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.320 | 6.959 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.59B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.39 | 3.68 | -418% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.28 | 37.13 | -38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -41.05 | 13.46 | -305% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.85 | 97.58 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement