Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKACX vs RGACX
FKACX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FKACX vs RGACX
FKACX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKACX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKACX is a Hold and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. FKACX (4.34B). FKACX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FKACX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FKACX (27 years) vs RGACX (24 years). FKACX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FKACX (27.59). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKACX: RGACX (250) vs FKACX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.65 vs. FKACX (-19.59). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.76 vs. FKACX (-45.76).
| FKACX | RGACX | FKACX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.93 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.93 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.330 | 9.968 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.34B | 342B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.59 | 2.65 | -739% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.03 | 41.57 | -41% |
| Returns for 5 years | -45.76 | 10.76 | -425% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.91 | 97.92 | -3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement