Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKACX vs RGAGX
FKACX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FKACX vs RGAGX
FKACX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKACX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKACX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FKACX (4.66B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FKACX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FKACX (0.00). FKACX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FKACX (27 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FKACX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FKACX (27.59). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKACX: RGAGX (250) vs FKACX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.55 vs. FKACX (-11.34). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 20.99 vs. FKACX (-38.94).
| FKACX | RGAGX | FKACX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.29 | 566% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.29 | 566% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.563 | 8.887 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.66B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.34 | 12.55 | -90% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.53 | 50.34 | -19% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.94 | 20.99 | -186% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.01 | 122.10 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement