Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKALX vs WCMLX
FKALX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FKALX vs WCMLX
FKALX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKALX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKALX is a Hold and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKALX has more cash in the bank: 3B vs. WCMLX (54.2M). FKALX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . FKALX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FKALX (9 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FKALX (0.93). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. FKALX (38.00). FKALX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: FKALX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.61 vs. FKALX (2.31). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 3.79 vs. FKALX (-20.28).
| FKALX | WCMLX | FKALX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.99 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.79 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.108 | 13.517 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3B | 54.2M | 5,528% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.31 | 22.61 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.44 | 28.03 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.28 | 3.79 | -536% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers