Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKARX vs RGAGX
FKARX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FKARX vs RGAGX
FKARX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKARX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKARX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. FKARX (4.68B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FKARX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FKARX (0.00). FKARX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FKARX (24 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FKARX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FKARX (27.59). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKARX: RGAGX (250) vs FKARX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.41 vs. FKARX (-2.98). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 27.14 vs. FKARX (-17.30).
| FKARX | RGAGX | FKARX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.29 | 393% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.29 | 393% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.799 | 10.599 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.68B | 338B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.98 | 15.41 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.20 | 55.31 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.30 | 27.14 | -64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.18 | 117.06 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers