Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKASX vs WCMLX
FKASX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FKASX vs WCMLX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap A
Price$51.81
Change+$0.10 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.32B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.90
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.31M
FKASX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKASX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKASX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKASX has more cash in the bank: 3.32B vs. WCMLX (44.3M). FKASX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: FKASX (0.97) vs WCMLX (0.00). FKASX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FKASX (23 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FKASX (1.50). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FKASX (34.00). FKASX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: FKASX (1500) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.34 vs. FKASX (4.86). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 22.00 vs. FKASX (3.41).
| FKASX | WCMLX | FKASX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.99 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.79 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.625 | 8.243 | 117% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.32B | 44.3M | 7,488% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.86 | 6.34 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.77 | 31.32 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.41 | 22.00 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement