Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKASX vs WCMLX
FKASX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FKASX vs WCMLX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap A
Price$50.66
Change+$0.13 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.16B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.09
Change+$0.05 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.13M
FKASX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKASX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKASX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKASX has more cash in the bank: 3.16B vs. WCMLX (41.1M). FKASX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: FKASX (0.95) vs WCMLX (0.00). FKASX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FKASX (23 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FKASX (1.50). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FKASX (34.00). FKASX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: FKASX (1500) vs WCMLX (100000). FKASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.49 vs. WCMLX (-2.18). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.99 vs. FKASX (-7.65).
| FKASX | WCMLX | FKASX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.99 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.79 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.399 | 1.400 | 529% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.16B | 41.1M | 7,693% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.49 | -2.18 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.33 | 20.96 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.65 | -0.99 | 775% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.89 | N/A | - |