Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKASX vs WCMLX
FKASX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FKASX vs WCMLX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap A
Price$48.20
Change+$0.50 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.26B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.13
Change+$0.17 (+1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.22M
FKASX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKASX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKASX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKASX has more cash in the bank: 3.26B vs. WCMLX (42.2M). FKASX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: FKASX (1.06) vs WCMLX (0.00). FKASX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FKASX (22 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FKASX (1.50). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FKASX (34.00). FKASX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: FKASX (1500) vs WCMLX (100000). FKASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.27 vs. WCMLX (-2.84). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 15.00 vs. FKASX (6.48).
| FKASX | WCMLX | FKASX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.99 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.79 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.184 | -6.998 | -31% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.26B | 42.2M | 7,723% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.27 | -2.84 | -80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.24 | 10.95 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.48 | 15.00 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.36 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement