Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKASX vs WCMLX
FKASX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FKASX vs WCMLX
FKASX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKASX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKASX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKASX has more cash in the bank: 2.76B vs. WCMLX (47.2M). FKASX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . FKASX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FKASX (24 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FKASX (1.51). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. FKASX (38.00). FKASX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: FKASX (1500) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.81 vs. FKASX (-9.52). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.51 vs. FKASX (-31.91).
| FKASX | WCMLX | FKASX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.99 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.79 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.062 | 3.852 | 235% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.76B | 47.2M | 5,839% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.52 | 2.81 | -339% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.77 | 23.40 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.91 | -7.51 | 425% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.87 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement