Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKDNX vs RGACX
FKDNX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FKDNX vs RGACX
FKDNX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKDNX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKDNX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FKDNX (29.7B). FKDNX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FKDNX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FKDNX (59 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FKDNX (0.77). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FKDNX (29.61). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKDNX: RGACX (250) vs FKDNX (1000). FKDNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.69 vs. RGACX (4.91). FKDNX return over 5 years is better than : 29.73 vs. RGACX (14.55).
| FKDNX | RGACX | FKDNX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.93 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.93 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 59 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.523 | 8.689 | 110% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.7B | 357B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.69 | 4.91 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.28 | 42.12 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.73 | 14.55 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 317.90 | 101.35 | 314% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement