Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKDNX vs RGAFX
FKDNX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FKDNX vs RGAFX
FKDNX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKDNX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKDNX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FKDNX (29.6B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FKDNX: RGAFX (0.46) vs FKDNX (0.00). FKDNX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FKDNX (59 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). FKDNX (0.77) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FKDNX (29.61). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKDNX: RGAFX (250) vs FKDNX (1000). RGAFX (11.90) and FKDNX (11.39) have marching annual gain over last year. FKDNX return over 5 years is better than : 34.80 vs. RGAFX (22.56).
| FKDNX | RGAFX | FKDNX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.34 | 226% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.34 | 226% |
| Fund Existence | 59 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.643 | 8.642 | 100% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.6B | 361B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.39 | 11.90 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.09 | 47.91 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.80 | 22.56 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 334.85 | 117.09 | 286% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers