Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKEMX vs RNWEX
FKEMX vs RNWEX Comparison
Open Charts FKEMX vs RNWEX
FKEMX vs RNWEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKEMX vs. RNWEX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKEMX is a Hold and RNWEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWEX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. FKEMX (11.3B). RNWEX pays higher dividends than FKEMX: RNWEX (0.97) vs FKEMX (0.06). FKEMX was incepted earlier than RNWEX: FKEMX (18 years) vs RNWEX (24 years). RNWEX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FKEMX (0.74). RNWEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FKEMX (31.00). FKEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWEX: FKEMX (0) vs RNWEX (250). FKEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.20 vs. RNWEX (12.97). FKEMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.36 vs. RNWEX (15.46).
| FKEMX | RNWEX | FKEMX / RNWEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.92 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.92 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.329 | 13.778 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 90B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.97 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.20 | 12.97 | 210% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.11 | 49.84 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.36 | 15.46 | 196% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.91 | 105.14 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement