Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKEMX vs RNWFX
FKEMX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FKEMX vs RNWFX
Fidelity Emerging Markets K
Price$48.68
Change-$0.40 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.27B
American Funds New World R5
Price$95.83
Change-$0.11 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.13B
FKEMX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKEMX vs. RNWFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKEMX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. FKEMX (9.27B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than FKEMX: RNWFX (0.95) vs FKEMX (0.59). FKEMX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FKEMX (18 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). FKEMX (0.74) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). FKEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). FKEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FKEMX (0) vs RNWFX (250). FKEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.36 vs. RNWFX (19.27). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.92 vs. FKEMX (16.92).
| FKEMX | RNWFX | FKEMX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.62 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.62 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.836 | 24.036 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.27B | 74.1B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.95 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.36 | 19.27 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.18 | 46.30 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.92 | 20.92 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.24 | 91.09 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement