Ad is loading...
FKEMX vs RNWFX
FKEMX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FKEMX vs RNWFX
Fidelity Emerging Markets K
Price$34.57
Change-$0.64 (-1.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.94B
American Funds New World R5
Price$71.40
Change-$1.89 (-2.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets57.67B
FKEMX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKEMX vs. RNWFX commentary
Apr 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKEMX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 57.7B vs. FKEMX (6.94B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than FKEMX: RNWFX (1.17) vs FKEMX (0.79). FKEMX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FKEMX (17 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). FKEMX (0.74) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). FKEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). FKEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FKEMX (0) vs RNWFX (250). RNWFX (-5.99) and FKEMX (-6.13) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.94 vs. FKEMX (33.34).
| FKEMX | RNWFX | FKEMX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.62 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.62 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.537 | -5.138 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.94B | 57.7B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.17 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.13 | -5.99 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.61 | -3.21 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.34 | 42.94 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.67 | 34.78 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers