Ad is loading...
FKEMX vs RNWFX
FKEMX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FKEMX vs RNWFX
Fidelity Emerging Markets K
Price$39.44
Change-$0.41 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds New World R5
Price$81.74
Change-$0.65 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FKEMX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKEMX vs. RNWFX commentary
Nov 14, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKEMX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 62.3B vs. FKEMX (8.95B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than FKEMX: RNWFX (1.51) vs FKEMX (1.18). FKEMX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FKEMX (17 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FKEMX (23.00). FKEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FKEMX (0) vs RNWFX (250). FKEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.46 vs. RNWFX (13.53). FKEMX return over 5 years is better than : 22.44 vs. RNWFX (18.88).
| FKEMX | RNWFX | FKEMX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.260 | 8.668 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.95B | 62.3B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 1.51 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.46 | 13.53 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.81 | -13.10 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.44 | 18.88 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.38 | 43.17 | 145% |