Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKEMX vs RNWFX
FKEMX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FKEMX vs RNWFX
FKEMX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKEMX vs. RNWFX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKEMX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. FKEMX (11.3B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than FKEMX: RNWFX (1.20) vs FKEMX (0.06). FKEMX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FKEMX (18 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). FKEMX (0.74) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FKEMX (31.00). FKEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FKEMX (0) vs RNWFX (250). FKEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.20 vs. RNWFX (13.34). FKEMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.36 vs. RNWFX (17.00).
| FKEMX | RNWFX | FKEMX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.62 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.62 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.329 | 14.005 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 90B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 1.20 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.20 | 13.34 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.11 | 51.31 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.36 | 17.00 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.91 | 108.51 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers