Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKEMX vs RNWFX
FKEMX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FKEMX vs RNWFX
FKEMX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKEMX vs. RNWFX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKEMX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. FKEMX (10.8B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than FKEMX: RNWFX (1.22) vs FKEMX (0.06). FKEMX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FKEMX (18 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). FKEMX (0.74) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FKEMX (31.00). FKEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FKEMX (0) vs RNWFX (250). FKEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.69 vs. RNWFX (22.59). FKEMX return over 5 years is better than : 39.26 vs. RNWFX (23.78).
| FKEMX | RNWFX | FKEMX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.62 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.62 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.753 | 17.094 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 88.6B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 1.22 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.69 | 22.59 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.54 | 56.61 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.26 | 23.78 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.21 | 111.30 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers