Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKEMX vs RNWHX
FKEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FKEMX vs RNWHX
FKEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKEMX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. FKEMX (11.3B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than FKEMX: RNWHX (1.15) vs FKEMX (0.06). FKEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FKEMX (18 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FKEMX (0.74) and RNWHX (0.72) have similar cost to investors . RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FKEMX (31.00). FKEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FKEMX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FKEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.20 vs. RNWHX (14.78). FKEMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.36 vs. RNWHX (16.98).
| FKEMX | RNWHX | FKEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.72 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.72 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.329 | 14.859 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 90B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 1.15 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.20 | 14.78 | 184% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.11 | 51.89 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.36 | 16.98 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.91 | 107.46 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers