Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKGRX vs GFACX
FKGRX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts FKGRX vs GFACX
FKGRX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKGRX vs. GFACX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKGRX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. FKGRX (18.3B). FKGRX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FKGRX was incepted earlier than GFACX: FKGRX (78 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FKGRX (0.78). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FKGRX (8.28). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKGRX: GFACX (250) vs FKGRX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.27 vs. FKGRX (4.92). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.16 vs. FKGRX (-0.12).
| FKGRX | GFACX | FKGRX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.35 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.35 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 78 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.093 | 9.747 | 73% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.3B | 338B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.92 | 11.27 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.28 | 43.89 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.12 | 13.16 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.21 | 87.56 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement