Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKGRX vs GFAFX
FKGRX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FKGRX vs GFAFX
FKGRX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKGRX vs. GFAFX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKGRX is a StrongBuy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FKGRX (17.4B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than FKGRX: GFAFX (0.20) vs FKGRX (0.00). FKGRX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FKGRX (78 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). FKGRX (0.78) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FKGRX (8.28). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKGRX: GFAFX (250) vs FKGRX (1000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.02 vs. FKGRX (-0.63). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.63 vs. FKGRX (-6.72).
| FKGRX | GFAFX | FKGRX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.65 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.65 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 78 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.778 | 7.862 | 73% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.4B | 361B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.63 | 6.02 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.41 | 43.41 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.72 | 15.63 | -43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.93 | 109.94 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement