Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKGRX vs RGACX
FKGRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FKGRX vs RGACX
FKGRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKGRX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKGRX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FKGRX (17B). FKGRX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FKGRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FKGRX (78 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FKGRX (0.78). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FKGRX (8.28). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKGRX: RGACX (250) vs FKGRX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.13 vs. FKGRX (-4.61). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 8.33 vs. FKGRX (-10.46).
| FKGRX | RGACX | FKGRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.93 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.93 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 78 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.011 | 3.589 | 112% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17B | 357B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.61 | -1.13 | 407% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.56 | 32.42 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.46 | 8.33 | -125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.88 | 91.18 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement