Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKGRX vs RGAGX
FKGRX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FKGRX vs RGAGX
FKGRX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKGRX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKGRX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. FKGRX (18.3B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FKGRX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FKGRX (0.00). FKGRX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FKGRX (78 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FKGRX (0.78) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FKGRX (8.28). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKGRX: RGAGX (250) vs FKGRX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. FKGRX (4.92). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 25.33 vs. FKGRX (-0.12).
| FKGRX | RGAGX | FKGRX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.29 | 269% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.29 | 269% |
| Fund Existence | 78 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.093 | 10.240 | 69% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.3B | 338B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.92 | 14.57 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.28 | 54.81 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.12 | 25.33 | -0% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.21 | 116.36 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement