Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKGRX vs RGAGX
FKGRX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FKGRX vs RGAGX
FKGRX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKGRX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKGRX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FKGRX (17.4B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FKGRX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FKGRX (0.00). FKGRX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FKGRX (78 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FKGRX (0.78) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FKGRX (8.28). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKGRX: RGAGX (250) vs FKGRX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.50 vs. FKGRX (-0.63). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 17.64 vs. FKGRX (-6.72).
| FKGRX | RGAGX | FKGRX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.29 | 269% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.29 | 269% |
| Fund Existence | 78 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.778 | 8.055 | 72% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.4B | 361B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.63 | 6.50 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.41 | 45.31 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.72 | 17.64 | -38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.93 | 114.06 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers