Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKMCX vs FSMAX
FKMCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FKMCX vs FSMAX
FKMCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKMCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKMCX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. FKMCX (8.94B). FKMCX (0.50) and FSMAX (0.49) have matching dividends . FKMCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FKMCX (18 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). FKMCX (0.55) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FKMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FKMCX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. FKMCX (9.71). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. FKMCX (25.86).
| FKMCX | FSMAX | FKMCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.04 | 1,571% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.04 | 1,571% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.704 | 13.370 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.94B | 40.1B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.49 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.71 | 13.05 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.94 | 63.92 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.86 | 32.77 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.69 | 133.42 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers