Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKMCX vs FSMAX
FKMCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FKMCX vs FSMAX
FKMCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKMCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKMCX is a StrongBuy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. FKMCX (9.4B). FSMAX (0.48) and FKMCX (0.48) have matching dividends . FKMCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FKMCX (18 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). FKMCX (0.60) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FKMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FKMCX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.37 vs. FKMCX (19.29). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.93 vs. FKMCX (30.36).
| FKMCX | FSMAX | FKMCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.04 | 1,714% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.04 | 1,714% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.554 | 15.019 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.4B | 43.5B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.48 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.29 | 22.37 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.66 | 65.83 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.36 | 33.93 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.28 | 139.98 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers