Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKMCX vs FSMDX
FKMCX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts FKMCX vs FSMDX
FKMCX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKMCX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jul 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKMCX is a StrongBuy and FSMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. FKMCX (9.4B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FKMCX: FSMDX (0.76) vs FKMCX (0.48). FKMCX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: FKMCX (18 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). FKMCX (0.60) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FKMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FKMCX (0) and FSMDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FKMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.29 vs. FSMDX (18.15). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 41.98 vs. FKMCX (30.36).
| FKMCX | FSMDX | FKMCX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.03 | 2,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.03 | 2,400% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.554 | 13.891 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.4B | 53.2B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.76 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.29 | 18.15 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.66 | 53.66 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.36 | 41.98 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.28 | 166.37 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement