Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKMCX vs FSMDX
FKMCX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts FKMCX vs FSMDX
FKMCX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKMCX vs. FSMDX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKMCX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. FKMCX (8.94B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FKMCX: FSMDX (0.75) vs FKMCX (0.50). FKMCX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: FKMCX (18 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). FKMCX (0.55) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FKMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FKMCX (0) and FSMDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. FKMCX (9.71). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. FKMCX (25.86).
| FKMCX | FSMDX | FKMCX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.03 | 2,200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.03 | 2,200% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.704 | 13.837 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.94B | 53.1B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.75 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.71 | 13.26 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.94 | 56.18 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.86 | 40.31 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.69 | 167.00 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers