Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKRCX vs IIGCX
FKRCX vs IIGCX Comparison
Open Charts FKRCX vs IIGCX
FKRCX vs IIGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKRCX vs. IIGCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKRCX is a Hold and IIGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKRCX has more cash in the bank: 3.49B vs. IIGCX (1.72B). FKRCX pays higher dividends than IIGCX: FKRCX (9.31) vs IIGCX (5.96). FKRCX was incepted earlier than IIGCX: FKRCX (57 years) vs IIGCX (23 years). IIGCX (2.12) is less costly to investors than FKRCX (0.87). IIGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FKRCX (22.76). FKRCX (1000) and IIGCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FKRCX (53.12) and IIGCX (51.83) have marching annual gain over last year. IIGCX (241.58) and FKRCX (235.87) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FKRCX | IIGCX | FKRCX / IIGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 2.12 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 2.12 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 57 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.156 | 18.080 | 73% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.49B | 1.72B | 203% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 9.31 | 5.96 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 53.12 | 51.83 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 331.80 | 289.42 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 235.87 | 241.58 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 317.20 | 289.85 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement