Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKRCX vs RYMPX
FKRCX vs RYMPX Comparison
Open Charts FKRCX vs RYMPX
FKRCX vs RYMPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKRCX vs. RYMPX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKRCX is a Buy and RYMPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKRCX has more cash in the bank: 3.13B vs. RYMPX (150M). FKRCX pays higher dividends than RYMPX: FKRCX (9.93) vs RYMPX (3.14). FKRCX was incepted earlier than RYMPX: FKRCX (57 years) vs RYMPX (23 years). RYMPX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FKRCX (0.87). RYMPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 452.00 vs. FKRCX (22.76). FKRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYMPX: FKRCX (1000) vs RYMPX (2500). FKRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 78.76 vs. RYMPX (67.38). FKRCX return over 5 years is better than : 171.02 vs. RYMPX (107.06).
| FKRCX | RYMPX | FKRCX / RYMPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.54 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.59 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 57 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.477 | 0.154 | -310% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.13B | 150M | 2,083% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 9.93 | 3.14 | 316% |
| Returns for 1 year | 78.76 | 67.38 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 258.97 | 180.18 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.02 | 107.06 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 275.86 | 169.47 | 163% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement