Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKRCX vs RYZCX
FKRCX vs RYZCX Comparison
Open Charts FKRCX vs RYZCX
FKRCX vs RYZCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKRCX vs. RYZCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKRCX is a Buy and RYZCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKRCX has more cash in the bank: 3.13B vs. RYZCX (150M). FKRCX pays higher dividends than RYZCX: FKRCX (9.93) vs RYZCX (3.96). FKRCX was incepted earlier than RYZCX: FKRCX (57 years) vs RYZCX (25 years). RYZCX (2.33) is less costly to investors than FKRCX (0.87). RYZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 452.00 vs. FKRCX (22.76). FKRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYZCX: FKRCX (1000) vs RYZCX (2500). FKRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 78.76 vs. RYZCX (66.13). FKRCX return over 5 years is better than : 171.02 vs. RYZCX (94.45).
| FKRCX | RYZCX | FKRCX / RYZCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 2.28 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 2.33 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 57 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.477 | -0.199 | 240% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.13B | 150M | 2,083% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 9.93 | 3.96 | 251% |
| Returns for 1 year | 78.76 | 66.13 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 258.97 | 172.21 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.02 | 94.45 | 181% |
| Returns for 10 years | 275.86 | 140.96 | 196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement