Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKTNX vs FRORX
FKTNX vs FRORX Comparison
Open Charts FKTNX vs FRORX
FKTNX vs FRORX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKTNX vs. FRORX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKTNX is a Hold and FRORX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRORX has more cash in the bank: 817M vs. FKTNX (672M). FRORX (3.51) and FKTNX (3.48) have matching dividends . FKTNX was incepted earlier than FRORX: FKTNX (9 years) vs FRORX (39 years). FRORX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FKTNX (0.55). FRORX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.43 vs. FKTNX (14.13). FRORX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKTNX: FRORX (1000) vs FKTNX (1000000). FRORX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.30 vs. FKTNX (6.93). FKTNX return over 5 years is better than : -0.03 vs. FRORX (-0.26).
| FKTNX | FRORX | FKTNX / FRORX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.66 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.66 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.356 | 2.286 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 672M | 817M | 82% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.48 | 3.51 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.93 | 7.30 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.85 | 11.64 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.03 | -0.26 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 1.95 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers