It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FKWL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileITRN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FKWL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ITRN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
FKWL (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а +0.47% price change this week, while ITRN (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was -4.53% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -2.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.96%.
FKWL is expected to report earnings on Nov 20, 2024.
ITRN is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.
FKWL | ITRN | FKWL / ITRN | |
Capitalization | 35.2M | 556M | 6% |
EBITDA | -1.17M | 82.3M | -1% |
Gain YTD | 25.959 | 2.565 | 1,012% |
P/E Ratio | 24.15 | 11.63 | 208% |
Revenue | 47.4M | 317M | 15% |
Total Cash | 32.7M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 0 | 6.53M | - |
FKWL | ITRN | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 62 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 78 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 45 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ITRN's Valuation (3) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FKWL (54) in the null industry. This means that ITRN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FKWL’s over the last 12 months.
ITRN's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as FKWL (88) in the null industry. This means that ITRN’s stock grew similarly to FKWL’s over the last 12 months.
ITRN's SMR Rating (32) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FKWL (90) in the null industry. This means that ITRN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FKWL’s over the last 12 months.
FKWL's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as ITRN (54) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to ITRN’s over the last 12 months.
FKWL's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ITRN (78) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that FKWL’s stock grew significantly faster than ITRN’s over the last 12 months.
FKWL | ITRN | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago48% | 4 days ago58% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 4 days ago63% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | 4 days ago57% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago69% | 4 days ago59% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago69% | 4 days ago55% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago52% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago70% | 11 days ago67% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago74% | 4 days ago58% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% | 4 days ago65% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 4 days ago70% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
CIRRX | 18.22 | 0.08 | +0.44% |
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities R | |||
BGRWX | 31.72 | -0.48 | -1.49% |
Barrett Growth Retail | |||
HLGZX | 43.61 | -0.88 | -1.98% |
Harding Loevner Global Equity Instl Z | |||
KTCAX | 41.55 | -0.98 | -2.30% |
DWS Science and Technology A | |||
RIFYX | 29.40 | -1.02 | -3.35% |
Victory RS Science and Technology Y |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FKWL and CSCO have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKWL and CSCO's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FKWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FKWL | 100% | -2.35% | ||
CSCO - FKWL | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.79% | ||
VISL - FKWL | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.25% | ||
VSAT - FKWL | 22% Poorly correlated | -4.27% | ||
BOXL - FKWL | 21% Poorly correlated | -17.97% | ||
ITRN - FKWL | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.41% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ITRN has been loosely correlated with BDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ITRN jumps, then BDC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ITRN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ITRN | 100% | -2.41% | ||
BDC - ITRN | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.00% | ||
ZBRA - ITRN | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.22% | ||
UI - ITRN | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.33% | ||
CIEN - ITRN | 32% Poorly correlated | -3.63% | ||
CLFD - ITRN | 32% Poorly correlated | -4.59% | ||
More |