FKWL
Price
$4.23
Change
-$0.02 (-0.47%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
35.23M
LTRX
Price
$2.34
Change
+$0.14 (+6.36%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
133.98M
97 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FKWL vs LTRX

Header iconFKWL vs LTRX Comparison
Open Charts FKWL vs LTRXBanner chart's image
Franklin Wireless
Price$4.23
Change-$0.02 (-0.47%)
Volume$8.57K
Capitalization35.23M
Lantronix
Price$2.34
Change+$0.14 (+6.36%)
Volume$301.3K
Capitalization133.98M
FKWL vs LTRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
FKWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LTRX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FKWL vs. LTRX commentary
Jun 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKWL is a Hold and LTRX is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FKWL: $4.23 vs. LTRX: $2.34)
Brand notoriety: FKWL and LTRX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FKWL: 24% vs. LTRX: 124%
Market capitalization -- FKWL: $35.23M vs. LTRX: $133.98M
FKWL [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $35.23M. LTRX’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $133.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $202.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $5.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FKWL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLTRX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FKWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LTRX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FKWL is a better buy in the long-term than LTRX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FKWL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LTRX’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FKWL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • LTRX’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LTRX is a better buy in the short-term than FKWL.

Price Growth

FKWL (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -1.63% price change this week, while LTRX (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +4.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

FKWL is expected to report earnings on May 28, 2025.

LTRX is expected to report earnings on Sep 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (+1.66% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LTRX($134M) has a higher market cap than FKWL($35.2M). FKWL YTD gains are higher at: -13.673 vs. LTRX (-43.204). LTRX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 944K vs. FKWL (-1.17M). FKWL has more cash in the bank: 32.7M vs. LTRX (22.1M). FKWL has less debt than LTRX: FKWL (0) vs LTRX (29.1M). LTRX has higher revenues than FKWL: LTRX (138M) vs FKWL (47.4M).
FKWLLTRXFKWL / LTRX
Capitalization35.2M134M26%
EBITDA-1.17M944K-124%
Gain YTD-13.673-43.20432%
P/E Ratio24.15N/A-
Revenue47.4M138M34%
Total Cash32.7M22.1M148%
Total Debt029.1M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FKWL vs LTRX: Fundamental Ratings
FKWL
LTRX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5964
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9191
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6384
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
399
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FKWL's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as LTRX (64) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to LTRX’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LTRX (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to LTRX’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as LTRX (91) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to LTRX’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as LTRX (84) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to LTRX’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LTRX (99) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that FKWL’s stock grew significantly faster than LTRX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FKWLLTRX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FKWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LTRX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GMOIX29.84N/A
N/A
GMO International Equity III
GSLLX21.91N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity Inv
MFWLX17.12N/A
N/A
MFS Global Total Return R6
LSCGX20.60N/A
N/A
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
RREMX14.58N/A
N/A
RBC Emerging Markets Equity R6

FKWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FKWL and ZBRA have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKWL and ZBRA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FKWL
1D Price
Change %
FKWL100%
-0.47%
ZBRA - FKWL
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
VSAT - FKWL
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ITRN - FKWL
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.11%
BOXL - FKWL
21%
Poorly correlated
+8.57%
LTRX - FKWL
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.36%
More

LTRX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LTRX and CLFD have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LTRX and CLFD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LTRX
1D Price
Change %
LTRX100%
+6.36%
CLFD - LTRX
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.42%
ZBRA - LTRX
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
CRNT - LTRX
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
CIEN - LTRX
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
DGII - LTRX
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
More