FKWL
Price
$4.89
Change
-$0.03 (-0.61%)
Updated
Jan 22 closing price
Capitalization
35.23M
27 days until earnings call
ZBRA
Price
$420.36
Change
+$2.29 (+0.55%)
Updated
Jan 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.47B
21 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FKWL vs ZBRA

Header iconFKWL vs ZBRA Comparison
Open Charts FKWL vs ZBRABanner chart's image
Franklin Wireless
Price$4.89
Change-$0.03 (-0.61%)
Volume$19.78K
Capitalization35.23M
Zebra Technologies
Price$420.36
Change+$2.29 (+0.55%)
Volume$4.85K
Capitalization15.47B
FKWL vs ZBRA Comparison Chart
Loading...
FKWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZBRA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FKWL vs. ZBRA commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKWL is a Buy and ZBRA is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (FKWL: $4.89 vs. ZBRA: $420.57)
Brand notoriety: FKWL and ZBRA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FKWL: 94% vs. ZBRA: 147%
Market capitalization -- FKWL: $35.23M vs. ZBRA: $15.47B
FKWL [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $35.23M. ZBRA’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $15.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $202.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $5.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FKWL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZBRA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FKWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZBRA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZBRA is a better buy in the long-term than FKWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FKWL’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZBRA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FKWL’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ZBRA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ZBRA is a better buy in the short-term than FKWL.

Price Growth

FKWL (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -0.81% price change this week, while ZBRA (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +5.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

FKWL is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

ZBRA is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (+2.06% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZBRA($15.5B) has a higher market cap than FKWL($35.2M). ZBRA has higher P/E ratio than FKWL: ZBRA (52.62) vs FKWL (24.15). ZBRA YTD gains are higher at: 8.894 vs. FKWL (-0.204). ZBRA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 643M vs. FKWL (-1.17M). ZBRA has more cash in the bank: 137M vs. FKWL (32.7M). FKWL has less debt than ZBRA: FKWL (0) vs ZBRA (2.41B). ZBRA has higher revenues than FKWL: ZBRA (4.58B) vs FKWL (47.4M).
FKWLZBRAFKWL / ZBRA
Capitalization35.2M15.5B0%
EBITDA-1.17M643M-0%
Gain YTD-0.2048.894-2%
P/E Ratio24.1552.6246%
Revenue47.4M4.58B1%
Total Cash32.7M137M24%
Total Debt02.41B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FKWL vs ZBRA: Fundamental Ratings
FKWL
ZBRA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7627
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8460
SMR RATING
1..100
9263
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3911
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FKWL's Valuation (52) in the null industry is in the same range as ZBRA (78) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to ZBRA’s over the last 12 months.

ZBRA's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as FKWL (84) in the null industry. This means that ZBRA’s stock grew similarly to FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

ZBRA's SMR Rating (63) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as FKWL (92) in the null industry. This means that ZBRA’s stock grew similarly to FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

ZBRA's Price Growth Rating (11) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as FKWL (39) in the null industry. This means that ZBRA’s stock grew similarly to FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as ZBRA (9) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to ZBRA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FKWLZBRA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
82%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FKWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZBRA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PAGS6.650.09
+1.37%
PagSeguro Digital Ltd
IR94.230.15
+0.16%
Ingersoll Rand
ILPT3.66-0.07
-1.88%
Industrial Logistics Properties Trust
MULN0.41-0.01
-2.95%
Mullen Automotive Inc
AMRC23.05-1.15
-4.75%
Ameresco

FKWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FKWL and CSCO have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKWL and CSCO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FKWL
1D Price
Change %
FKWL100%
-0.61%
CSCO - FKWL
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
ZBRA - FKWL
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
INFN - FKWL
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
VISL - FKWL
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VSAT - FKWL
22%
Poorly correlated
-8.81%
More

ZBRA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZBRA has been loosely correlated with CLFD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZBRA jumps, then CLFD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZBRA
1D Price
Change %
ZBRA100%
+0.60%
CLFD - ZBRA
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
PI - ZBRA
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
CIEN - ZBRA
42%
Loosely correlated
+6.96%
BDC - ZBRA
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
DGII - ZBRA
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
More