FKWL
Price
$4.23
Change
-$0.02 (-0.47%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
35.23M
ZBRA
Price
$290.94
Change
-$0.08 (-0.03%)
Updated
Jun 5, 10:47 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.47B
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FKWL vs ZBRA

Header iconFKWL vs ZBRA Comparison
Open Charts FKWL vs ZBRABanner chart's image
Franklin Wireless
Price$4.23
Change-$0.02 (-0.47%)
Volume$8.57K
Capitalization35.23M
Zebra Technologies
Price$290.94
Change-$0.08 (-0.03%)
Volume$100
Capitalization15.47B
FKWL vs ZBRA Comparison Chart
Loading...
FKWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZBRA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FKWL vs. ZBRA commentary
Jun 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKWL is a Hold and ZBRA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FKWL: $4.23 vs. ZBRA: $291.03)
Brand notoriety: FKWL and ZBRA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FKWL: 24% vs. ZBRA: 51%
Market capitalization -- FKWL: $35.23M vs. ZBRA: $15.47B
FKWL [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $35.23M. ZBRA’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $15.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $202.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $5.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FKWL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZBRA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FKWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZBRA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FKWL is a better buy in the long-term than ZBRA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FKWL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZBRA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FKWL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • ZBRA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FKWL is a better buy in the short-term than ZBRA.

Price Growth

FKWL (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -1.63% price change this week, while ZBRA (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +0.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was +1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

FKWL is expected to report earnings on May 28, 2025.

ZBRA is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (+1.66% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZBRA($15.5B) has a higher market cap than FKWL($35.2M). ZBRA has higher P/E ratio than FKWL: ZBRA (52.62) vs FKWL (24.15). FKWL YTD gains are higher at: -13.673 vs. ZBRA (-24.647). ZBRA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 643M vs. FKWL (-1.17M). ZBRA has more cash in the bank: 137M vs. FKWL (32.7M). FKWL has less debt than ZBRA: FKWL (0) vs ZBRA (2.41B). ZBRA has higher revenues than FKWL: ZBRA (4.58B) vs FKWL (47.4M).
FKWLZBRAFKWL / ZBRA
Capitalization35.2M15.5B0%
EBITDA-1.17M643M-0%
Gain YTD-13.673-24.64755%
P/E Ratio24.1552.6246%
Revenue47.4M4.58B1%
Total Cash32.7M137M24%
Total Debt02.41B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FKWL vs ZBRA: Fundamental Ratings
FKWL
ZBRA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5974
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10086
SMR RATING
1..100
9152
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6356
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
396
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FKWL's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as ZBRA (67) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to ZBRA’s over the last 12 months.

ZBRA's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as FKWL (100) in the null industry. This means that ZBRA’s stock grew similarly to FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

ZBRA's SMR Rating (52) in the Computer Peripherals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FKWL (91) in the null industry. This means that ZBRA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

ZBRA's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as FKWL (63) in the null industry. This means that ZBRA’s stock grew similarly to FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ZBRA (96) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that FKWL’s stock grew significantly faster than ZBRA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FKWLZBRA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FKWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZBRA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VERX41.420.56
+1.37%
Vertex
TG8.590.05
+0.59%
Tredegar Corp
CRSR9.11N/A
N/A
Corsair Gaming
COEP9.48-0.07
-0.68%
Coeptis Therapeutics Holdings Inc
TGT93.94-1.84
-1.92%
Target Corp

FKWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FKWL and ZBRA have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKWL and ZBRA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FKWL
1D Price
Change %
FKWL100%
-0.47%
ZBRA - FKWL
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
VSAT - FKWL
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ITRN - FKWL
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.11%
BOXL - FKWL
21%
Poorly correlated
+8.57%
LTRX - FKWL
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.36%
More

ZBRA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZBRA has been closely correlated with BDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZBRA jumps, then BDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZBRA
1D Price
Change %
ZBRA100%
-0.33%
BDC - ZBRA
69%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
LITE - ZBRA
66%
Closely correlated
+3.39%
EXTR - ZBRA
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
CIEN - ZBRA
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
HPE - ZBRA
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
More