This stock comparison examines BDC and ZBRA, two companies in the telecommunications equipment and data capture sectors. Both provide essential connectivity and tracking solutions amid rising demand for network infrastructure and automation. Traders seeking short-term momentum or investors eyeing industrial tech exposure will find value in analyzing their relative performance, valuations, and recent catalysts. In the current market environment, where AI-driven infrastructure and supply chain efficiencies drive sentiment, understanding these contrasts aids informed positioning in stock comparison and relative performance evaluations.
Belden Inc. (BDC) is a global supplier of network infrastructure and connectivity solutions, serving data centers, broadband providers, and industries like healthcare and government. Its products include copper/fiber cables, networking components, and broadband solutions. Trading around $112 with a $4.37B market cap, the stock has seen volatility in recent weeks, with a 52-week range of $103.57–$159.99. Year-to-date down 3.61% and up 4.86% over one year, it lags the S&P 500 but shows resilience. Recent Q1 2026 earnings beat sales estimates at $696.4M (up 11.4% YoY), with adjusted EPS of $1.77, though shares dipped post-report amid market skepticism on the $1.846B RUCKUS Networks acquisition to bolster wireless offerings. Partnerships like OptiCool for AI data centers have supported sentiment, with a trailing P/E of 18.91 and ROE (return on equity) of 18.89% highlighting profitability. Beta at 1.18 reflects moderate volatility influenced by infrastructure spending trends.
Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) specializes in automatic identification and data capture solutions, including printers, RFID systems, scanners, and mobile computers for retail, logistics, healthcare, and manufacturing. With segments in Connected Frontline and Asset Visibility & Automation, it enables workflow optimization. At $226 per share and $11.12B market cap, the stock ranges $199.05–$352.66 over 52 weeks. YTD down 6.91% and 14.82% over one year, it trails broader indices. Recent activity features AI investments like Apera AI for robotics and Cubic Vocality partnerships, plus healthcare ties with Aiva, boosting automation narrative ahead of Q1 2026 earnings on May 12. Q4 2025 revenue hit $1.48B (up 10.6% YoY), matching EPS at $4.33. Trailing P/E stands at 27.63, with ROE at 11.68%; beta of 1.62 signals higher sensitivity to tech swings and supply chain dynamics.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. Featuring 25 standout bots selected from 351 total, it highlights those excelling in current volatility, with stats like annualized returns up to +285% (e.g., SPACE infrastructure bot at +285.35%, 72% win rate), +167% for nuclear/energy plays, and +95% in semiconductors. Win rates range 60–75%, profit factors 2–3+, emphasizing momentum and sector rotation in AI, semis, and industrials. These bots offer real-time signals, risk management, and copy trading with no minimum balance. Explore Tickeron’s AI tools to align bots with your trading style and market positioning.
BDC and ZBRA both thrive in connectivity and data solutions but diverge in scale and focus: BDC's cable/networking targets broadband/data centers, while ZBRA's hardware/software emphasizes RFID/automation for logistics. Growth drivers include BDC's RUCKUS M&A (mergers and acquisitions) for full-stack networking versus ZBRA's AI/robotics bets. Recent momentum favors neither decisively, with BDC down less YTD but ZBRA rebounding on partnerships. Risks: BDC faces integration post-acquisition; ZBRA higher debt ($2.7B vs. $1.35B). Sector exposure overlaps industrials/tech, but ZBRA's larger revenue trades at premium valuation. Sentiment tilts positive on BDC's earnings beats amid infrastructure tailwinds.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors BDC over ZBRA, citing superior long-term buy rating from stronger fundamental scores, lower P/E, higher ROE, and reduced debt load despite similar sector headwinds. Recent trend consistency post-earnings and acquisition catalysts position BDC better relatively, though ZBRA's AI initiatives offer upside potential. Probabilistic edge leans to BDC for stability in current market positioning.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BDC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZBRA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BDC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZBRA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BDC (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а +6.04% price change this week, while ZBRA (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +2.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -4.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +57.33%.
BDC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
ZBRA is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.
| BDC | ZBRA | BDC / ZBRA | |
| Capitalization | 4.74B | 11.7B | 40% |
| EBITDA | 449M | 884M | 51% |
| Gain YTD | 4.464 | 1.205 | 371% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.48 | 29.68 | 69% |
| Revenue | 2.79B | 5.58B | 50% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 114M | - |
| Total Debt | 1.35B | 2.85B | 47% |
BDC | ZBRA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 39 Fair valued | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BDC's Valuation (39) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as ZBRA (39) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that BDC’s stock grew similarly to ZBRA’s over the last 12 months.
BDC's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Electrical Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for ZBRA (100) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that BDC’s stock grew significantly faster than ZBRA’s over the last 12 months.
BDC's SMR Rating (47) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as ZBRA (66) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that BDC’s stock grew similarly to ZBRA’s over the last 12 months.
BDC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as ZBRA (58) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that BDC’s stock grew similarly to ZBRA’s over the last 12 months.
ZBRA's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as BDC (57) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that ZBRA’s stock grew similarly to BDC’s over the last 12 months.
| BDC | ZBRA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 67% | 7 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 70% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LNOK | 79.08 | 10.59 | +15.46% |
| Defiance Daily Target 2X Long NOK ETF | |||
| KNOW | 12.98 | 0.14 | +1.06% |
| Fundamentals First ETF | |||
| BKMC | 121.76 | 0.23 | +0.19% |
| BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF | |||
| CRTC | 38.40 | -0.19 | -0.50% |
| Xtrackers US National Crtcl Techs ETF | |||
| MOAT | 100.99 | -1.13 | -1.11% |
| VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZBRA has been loosely correlated with PI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZBRA jumps, then PI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ZBRA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZBRA | 100% | +4.14% | ||
| PI - ZBRA | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.12% | ||
| ITRN - ZBRA | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.74% | ||
| BDC - ZBRA | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.31% | ||
| KN - ZBRA | 38% Loosely correlated | +3.46% | ||
| HPE - ZBRA | 37% Loosely correlated | +2.09% | ||
More | ||||