Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKYTX vs FTAZX
FKYTX vs FTAZX Comparison
Open Charts FKYTX vs FTAZX
FKYTX vs FTAZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKYTX vs. FTAZX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKYTX is a Hold and FTAZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTAZX has more cash in the bank: 603M vs. FKYTX (221M). FTAZX pays higher dividends than FKYTX: FTAZX (3.37) vs FKYTX (3.20). FKYTX was incepted earlier than FTAZX: FKYTX (39 years) vs FTAZX (39 years). FKYTX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FTAZX (0.67). FKYTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FTAZX (17.42). FKYTX initial investment is less costly to investors than FTAZX (4%) vs FTAZX (4%). FTAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKYTX: FTAZX (1000) vs FKYTX (2500). FTAZX (8.22) and FKYTX (8.08) have marching annual gain over last year. FKYTX return over 5 years is better than : 1.21 vs. FTAZX (0.36).
| FKYTX | FTAZX | FKYTX / FTAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.67 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.67 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.378 | 1.965 | 70% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 112% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 221M | 603M | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.20 | 3.37 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.08 | 8.22 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.48 | 12.48 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.21 | 0.36 | 336% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.31 | 3.86 | 293% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement