Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKYTX vs FTAZX
FKYTX vs FTAZX Comparison
Open Charts FKYTX vs FTAZX
FKYTX vs FTAZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKYTX vs. FTAZX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKYTX is a Hold and FTAZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTAZX has more cash in the bank: 581M vs. FKYTX (212M). FTAZX (3.49) and FKYTX (3.34) have matching dividends . FKYTX was incepted earlier than FTAZX: FKYTX (39 years) vs FTAZX (39 years). FKYTX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FTAZX (0.68). FKYTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FTAZX (17.42). FKYTX initial investment is less costly to investors than FTAZX (4%) vs FTAZX (4%). FTAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKYTX: FTAZX (1000) vs FKYTX (2500). FTAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.16 vs. FKYTX (3.65). FKYTX return over 5 years is better than : -2.00 vs. FTAZX (-2.34).
| FKYTX | FTAZX | FKYTX / FTAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.68 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.68 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.387 | -0.366 | 379% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 112% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 212M | 581M | 36% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.34 | 3.49 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.65 | 4.16 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.18 | 10.51 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.00 | -2.34 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.08 | 0.68 | 1,194% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement