Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLACX vs RGAGX
FLACX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FLACX vs RGAGX
FLACX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLACX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLACX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FLACX (11.3B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FLACX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FLACX (0.00). FLACX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FLACX (14 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FLACX (1.54) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FLACX (13.00). FLACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FLACX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FLACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.37 vs. RGAGX (0.49). FLACX return over 5 years is better than : 53.10 vs. RGAGX (15.00).
| FLACX | RGAGX | FLACX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.29 | 531% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.29 | 531% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.309 | 9.321 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 353B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.37 | 0.49 | 3,551% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.99 | 44.65 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.10 | 15.00 | 354% |
| Returns for 10 years | 191.54 | 110.30 | 174% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement