Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLCGX vs GWPEX
FLCGX vs GWPEX Comparison
Open Charts FLCGX vs GWPEX
FLCGX vs GWPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCGX vs. GWPEX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCGX is a Hold and GWPEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GWPEX has more cash in the bank: 26.5B vs. FLCGX (45.6M). FLCGX pays higher dividends than GWPEX: FLCGX (0.55) vs GWPEX (0.52). FLCGX was incepted earlier than GWPEX: FLCGX (41 years) vs GWPEX (14 years). FLCGX (1.74) is less costly to investors than GWPEX (0.47). FLCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 170.00 vs. GWPEX (1.00). GWPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLCGX: GWPEX (250) vs FLCGX (2500). GWPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.54 vs. FLCGX (16.13). GWPEX return over 5 years is better than : 31.91 vs. FLCGX (-5.57).
| FLCGX | GWPEX | FLCGX / GWPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.47 | 370% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.47 | 370% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.966 | 11.393 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.6M | 26.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.52 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.13 | 22.54 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.20 | 64.25 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.57 | 31.91 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.26 | 122.50 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers