Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLCGX vs RGSFX
FLCGX vs RGSFX Comparison
Open Charts FLCGX vs RGSFX
FLCGX vs RGSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCGX vs. RGSFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCGX is a Buy and RGSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGSFX has more cash in the bank: 28.2B vs. FLCGX (45.2M). FLCGX pays higher dividends than RGSFX: FLCGX (0.54) vs RGSFX (0.49). FLCGX was incepted earlier than RGSFX: FLCGX (41 years) vs RGSFX (11 years). FLCGX (1.74) is less costly to investors than RGSFX (0.51). FLCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 170.00 vs. RGSFX (1.00). RGSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLCGX: RGSFX (250) vs FLCGX (2500). RGSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.85 vs. FLCGX (9.98). RGSFX return over 5 years is better than : 24.64 vs. FLCGX (-1.43).
| FLCGX | RGSFX | FLCGX / RGSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.51 | 341% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.51 | 341% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.776 | 9.248 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.2M | 28.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.49 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.98 | 12.85 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.88 | 51.94 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.43 | 24.64 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.04 | 113.98 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement