Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLCGX vs RGWBX
FLCGX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts FLCGX vs RGWBX
FLCGX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCGX vs. RGWBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCGX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 28.1B vs. FLCGX (45.2M). FLCGX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: FLCGX (0.55) vs RGWBX (0.00). FLCGX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: FLCGX (41 years) vs RGWBX (14 years). FLCGX (1.74) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). FLCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 170.00 vs. RGWBX (1.00). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLCGX: RGWBX (250) vs FLCGX (2500). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.55 vs. FLCGX (14.86). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 21.80 vs. FLCGX (-2.51).
| FLCGX | RGWBX | FLCGX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.46 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.46 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.958 | 10.704 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.2M | 28.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.86 | 19.55 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.64 | 56.68 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.51 | 21.80 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.12 | 116.72 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement