Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLCGX vs RGWBX
FLCGX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts FLCGX vs RGWBX
FLCGX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCGX vs. RGWBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCGX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 28.1B vs. FLCGX (45.5M). FLCGX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: FLCGX (0.53) vs RGWBX (0.00). FLCGX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: FLCGX (42 years) vs RGWBX (14 years). FLCGX (1.74) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). FLCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 170.00 vs. RGWBX (1.00). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLCGX: RGWBX (250) vs FLCGX (2500). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.60 vs. FLCGX (3.86). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 15.06 vs. FLCGX (-0.61).
| FLCGX | RGWBX | FLCGX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.46 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.46 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.484 | 9.579 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.5M | 28.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.86 | 6.60 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.03 | 51.28 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.61 | 15.06 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.61 | 102.45 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers