Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLCGX vs RGWGX
FLCGX vs RGWGX Comparison
Open Charts FLCGX vs RGWGX
FLCGX vs RGWGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCGX vs. RGWGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCGX is a Buy and RGWGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWGX has more cash in the bank: 28.2B vs. FLCGX (45.2M). RGWGX pays higher dividends than FLCGX: RGWGX (0.59) vs FLCGX (0.54). FLCGX was incepted earlier than RGWGX: FLCGX (41 years) vs RGWGX (14 years). FLCGX (1.74) is less costly to investors than RGWGX (0.38). FLCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 170.00 vs. RGWGX (1.00). RGWGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLCGX: RGWGX (250) vs FLCGX (2500). RGWGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.06 vs. FLCGX (9.98). RGWGX return over 5 years is better than : 25.65 vs. FLCGX (-1.43).
| FLCGX | RGWGX | FLCGX / RGWGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.38 | 458% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.38 | 458% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.776 | 9.337 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.2M | 28.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.59 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.98 | 13.06 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.88 | 52.76 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.43 | 25.65 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.04 | 116.22 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement