Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLCNX vs GFACX
FLCNX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts FLCNX vs GFACX
FLCNX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCNX vs. GFACX commentary
Aug 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCNX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. FLCNX (36.3B). FLCNX pays higher dividends than GFACX: FLCNX (0.18) vs GFACX (0.00). FLCNX was incepted earlier than GFACX: FLCNX (9 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FLCNX (0.45). FLCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). FLCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: FLCNX (0) vs GFACX (250). FLCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.63 vs. GFACX (1.89). FLCNX return over 5 years is better than : 70.93 vs. GFACX (7.32).
| FLCNX | GFACX | FLCNX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.35 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.35 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.145 | 8.722 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.3B | 342B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.63 | 1.89 | 245% |
| Returns for 3 years | 81.87 | 39.45 | 208% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.93 | 7.32 | 969% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.07 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers