Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLCNX vs GFAFX
FLCNX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FLCNX vs GFAFX
FLCNX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCNX vs. GFAFX commentary
Aug 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCNX is a Hold and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. FLCNX (36.3B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than FLCNX: GFAFX (0.21) vs FLCNX (0.18). FLCNX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FLCNX (9 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). GFAFX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FLCNX (0.45). FLCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). FLCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: FLCNX (0) vs GFAFX (250). FLCNX (4.63) and GFAFX (4.42) have marching annual gain over last year. FLCNX return over 5 years is better than : 70.93 vs. GFAFX (16.80).
| FLCNX | GFAFX | FLCNX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.65 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.65 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.145 | 9.194 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.3B | 342B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 0.21 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.63 | 4.42 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 81.87 | 48.04 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.93 | 16.80 | 422% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 101.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers