Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLCNX vs RGABX
FLCNX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts FLCNX vs RGABX
FLCNX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCNX vs. RGABX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCNX is a Hold and RGABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FLCNX (37.5B). FLCNX pays higher dividends than RGABX: FLCNX (0.18) vs RGABX (0.00). FLCNX was incepted earlier than RGABX: FLCNX (9 years) vs RGABX (24 years). RGABX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FLCNX (0.45). FLCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RGABX (32.00). FLCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: FLCNX (0) vs RGABX (250). FLCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.66 vs. RGABX (6.32). FLCNX return over 5 years is better than : 75.37 vs. RGABX (10.01).
| FLCNX | RGABX | FLCNX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.38 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.38 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.087 | 6.232 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.5B | 361B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.66 | 6.32 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.06 | 37.63 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.37 | 10.01 | 753% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 88.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement