Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLCNX vs RGAGX
FLCNX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FLCNX vs RGAGX
FLCNX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCNX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCNX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FLCNX (37.5B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FLCNX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FLCNX (0.18). FLCNX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FLCNX (9 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FLCNX (0.45) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). FLCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). FLCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FLCNX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.97 vs. FLCNX (7.66). FLCNX return over 5 years is better than : 75.37 vs. RGAGX (20.11).
| FLCNX | RGAGX | FLCNX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.29 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.29 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.087 | 6.752 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.5B | 361B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 0.51 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.66 | 8.97 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.06 | 46.48 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.37 | 20.11 | 375% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 112.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement