Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLCOX vs RMEBX
FLCOX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FLCOX vs RMEBX
FLCOX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCOX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCOX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. FLCOX (15.2B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than FLCOX: RMEBX (0.99) vs FLCOX (0.85). FLCOX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FLCOX (10 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FLCOX (0.04). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FLCOX (14.00). FLCOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FLCOX (0) vs RMEBX (250). FLCOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.42 vs. RMEBX (4.65). FLCOX return over 5 years is better than : 75.01 vs. RMEBX (34.68).
| FLCOX | RMEBX | FLCOX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.07 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.07 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.353 | 8.448 | 253% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.2B | 117B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.99 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.42 | 4.65 | 568% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.71 | 34.88 | 200% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.01 | 34.68 | 216% |
| Returns for 10 years | 181.10 | 92.45 | 196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers