Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLCOX vs RMFCX
FLCOX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FLCOX vs RMFCX
FLCOX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCOX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCOX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FLCOX (14.7B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than FLCOX: RMFCX (1.15) vs FLCOX (0.87). FLCOX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FLCOX (10 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FLCOX (0.04). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FLCOX (14.00). FLCOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: FLCOX (0) vs RMFCX (250). FLCOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.10 vs. RMFCX (9.09). FLCOX return over 5 years is better than : 74.12 vs. RMFCX (37.08).
| FLCOX | RMFCX | FLCOX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.91 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.91 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.580 | 9.496 | 217% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.7B | 118B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.15 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.10 | 9.09 | 342% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.77 | 33.16 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.12 | 37.08 | 200% |
| Returns for 10 years | 179.04 | 92.36 | 194% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers