Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLCOX vs RMFCX
FLCOX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FLCOX vs RMFCX
FLCOX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCOX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCOX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FLCOX (14.7B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than FLCOX: RMFCX (1.15) vs FLCOX (0.87). FLCOX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FLCOX (10 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FLCOX (0.04). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FLCOX (14.00). FLCOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: FLCOX (0) vs RMFCX (250). FLCOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.31 vs. RMFCX (9.14). FLCOX return over 5 years is better than : 75.88 vs. RMFCX (36.70).
| FLCOX | RMFCX | FLCOX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.91 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.91 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.657 | 10.454 | 217% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.7B | 118B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.15 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.31 | 9.14 | 342% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.89 | 38.82 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.88 | 36.70 | 207% |
| Returns for 10 years | 177.82 | 92.27 | 193% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers