Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLCOX vs RMFEX
FLCOX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FLCOX vs RMFEX
FLCOX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCOX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCOX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FLCOX (14B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than FLCOX: RMFEX (1.42) vs FLCOX (0.90). FLCOX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FLCOX (10 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). RMFEX (0.62) is less costly to investors than FLCOX (0.04). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FLCOX (14.00). FLCOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: FLCOX (0) vs RMFEX (250). FLCOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.98 vs. RMFEX (9.23). FLCOX return over 5 years is better than : 72.09 vs. RMFEX (39.39).
| FLCOX | RMFEX | FLCOX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.62 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.62 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.261 | 9.303 | 196% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14B | 118B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.42 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.98 | 9.23 | 303% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.43 | 36.13 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.09 | 39.39 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 170.47 | 99.14 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement