Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLCPX vs RWMFX
FLCPX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FLCPX vs RWMFX
FLCPX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCPX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCPX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. FLCPX (17B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FLCPX: RWMFX (1.41) vs FLCPX (0.50). FLCPX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FLCPX (11 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than FLCPX (0.02). FLCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). FLCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: FLCPX (0) vs RWMFX (250). FLCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.27 vs. RWMFX (2.09). FLCPX return over 5 years is better than : 52.38 vs. RWMFX (27.39).
| FLCPX | RWMFX | FLCPX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.31 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.02 | 0.31 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.453 | 4.508 | 276% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17B | 218B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.41 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.27 | 2.09 | 828% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.72 | 30.24 | 231% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.38 | 27.39 | 191% |
| Returns for 10 years | 194.62 | 82.36 | 236% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers